<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing behavior via awareness of energy consumption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/02/changing-behavior-via-awareness-of-energy-consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/02/changing-behavior-via-awareness-of-energy-consumption/</link>
	<description>Not blaming the user since 2007!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:49:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/02/changing-behavior-via-awareness-of-energy-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/02/changing-behavior-via-awareness-of-energy-consumption/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4754109.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; This article &lt;/a&gt; linked off of the BBC article talks about studies that have been conducted with these specific types of meters.  It seems like the most optimistic assessment puts conservation gains at only 10%.  For years you have been able to buy the &lt;a href=&quot;http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Killawatt &lt;/a&gt; to do this for specific appliances in the home.  That said, I have never quite made it around to getting one myself.  The utilities company out here (gas and electric) not only allows you to track changes in your usage through your online bill, but frequently offers special rebates to users who can post energy bills down a certain % from their previous year&#039;s bill in the same month.

On the car side of things, people seem to appreciate efficiency in cycles.  Back in the OPEC crisis period 70s, quite a few cars had optional gages that indicated whether you were wasting gas or not (based on a simple vacuum measurement).  After market providers also allowed users to add these gages to the cars they already had.  By 76 Cadillac had meters in their cars giving instant MPG, and average MPG in real-time digital readouts.  I recall contemporary articles either fell into two categories ... people who responded by trying to get the best possible number and those who found it depressing.

A final note on meters of this type goes to accuracy ... almost any new car with enough of an enthusiast following to have a website will have at least one discussion forum devoted to gas mileage; the majority of these discussions come to the conclusion that the dashboard readouts for fuel consumption are universally optimistic.  The fill-drive-fill method is still the most accurate, but the distance between feedback loop between this and  driving technique is obviously too open.  To me this suggests that the greatest value in instant MPG measurement would be in identifying relative changes... a task that might not be best suited by inaccurate, rapidly changing digital displays.  The old vacuum units had analog needles or stoplight-like red/yellow/green 3 light displays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4754109.stm" rel="nofollow"> This article </a> linked off of the BBC article talks about studies that have been conducted with these specific types of meters.  It seems like the most optimistic assessment puts conservation gains at only 10%.  For years you have been able to buy the <a href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review" rel="nofollow"> Killawatt </a> to do this for specific appliances in the home.  That said, I have never quite made it around to getting one myself.  The utilities company out here (gas and electric) not only allows you to track changes in your usage through your online bill, but frequently offers special rebates to users who can post energy bills down a certain % from their previous year&#8217;s bill in the same month.</p>
<p>On the car side of things, people seem to appreciate efficiency in cycles.  Back in the OPEC crisis period 70s, quite a few cars had optional gages that indicated whether you were wasting gas or not (based on a simple vacuum measurement).  After market providers also allowed users to add these gages to the cars they already had.  By 76 Cadillac had meters in their cars giving instant MPG, and average MPG in real-time digital readouts.  I recall contemporary articles either fell into two categories &#8230; people who responded by trying to get the best possible number and those who found it depressing.</p>
<p>A final note on meters of this type goes to accuracy &#8230; almost any new car with enough of an enthusiast following to have a website will have at least one discussion forum devoted to gas mileage; the majority of these discussions come to the conclusion that the dashboard readouts for fuel consumption are universally optimistic.  The fill-drive-fill method is still the most accurate, but the distance between feedback loop between this and  driving technique is obviously too open.  To me this suggests that the greatest value in instant MPG measurement would be in identifying relative changes&#8230; a task that might not be best suited by inaccurate, rapidly changing digital displays.  The old vacuum units had analog needles or stoplight-like red/yellow/green 3 light displays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
