<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: OLPC may eventually switch from Linux to Windows XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/</link>
	<description>Not blaming the user since 2007!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Drewes</title>
		<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Drewes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>The OLPC Wiki has some documents detailing their Human Interface Guidelines.  I have not had a chance to read over these yet, but perhaps their is some discussion of principles underlying the design:

http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines

It&#039;s interesting to note that there are a number of additional controls on the OLPC keyboard that are very task-specific and unique to the OLPC:

http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines/The_Sugar_Interface/Input_Systems

Also, there are apparently some bootable CD images available of different flavors of Linux sporting the Sugar environment running on top of them - I haven&#039;t had chance to try one of these either, but I&#039;ll hopefully take a look this weekend:

http://wiki.laptop.org/go/LiveCd

I&#039;ll reserve any judgments until I&#039;ve had a chance to actually try a live version of the interface and read a bit more about the basis for their design decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OLPC Wiki has some documents detailing their Human Interface Guidelines.  I have not had a chance to read over these yet, but perhaps their is some discussion of principles underlying the design:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines" >http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that there are a number of additional controls on the OLPC keyboard that are very task-specific and unique to the OLPC:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines/The_Sugar_Interface/Input_Systems" >http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines/The_Sugar_Interface/Input_Systems</a></p>
<p>Also, there are apparently some bootable CD images available of different flavors of Linux sporting the Sugar environment running on top of them &#8211; I haven&#8217;t had chance to try one of these either, but I&#8217;ll hopefully take a look this weekend:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/LiveCd" >http://wiki.laptop.org/go/LiveCd</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll reserve any judgments until I&#8217;ve had a chance to actually try a live version of the interface and read a bit more about the basis for their design decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan k.</title>
		<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan k.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>The interface definitely raises a few red flags for me, in terms of what Travis said on the previous post about this topic: 

&quot;For me, the biggest question with something like Sugar is whether is does children a service or disservice to provide them with computing tools that will not expose them to many of the UI conventions used worldwide.&quot;

But in other regards, I wonder what the UI was based on, and if the ideas of designing for children in low-income, low-technology households was taken into account. The interface seems pretty obvious to me at the forefront, but if this is their first hypothetical introduction to a GUI, I wonder how they will react to the mainstream UIs later on. So interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interface definitely raises a few red flags for me, in terms of what Travis said on the previous post about this topic: </p>
<p>&#8220;For me, the biggest question with something like Sugar is whether is does children a service or disservice to provide them with computing tools that will not expose them to many of the UI conventions used worldwide.&#8221;</p>
<p>But in other regards, I wonder what the UI was based on, and if the ideas of designing for children in low-income, low-technology households was taken into account. The interface seems pretty obvious to me at the forefront, but if this is their first hypothetical introduction to a GUI, I wonder how they will react to the mainstream UIs later on. So interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  humanfactorsblog.org/2008/04/23/report-olpc-may-eventually-switch-from-linux-to-windows-xp/feed/ ) in 0.79972 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 3:16 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 4:16 pm UTC -->
