<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fitts&#8217; Law and Your Microwave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humanfactorsblog.org/2009/08/12/1148/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2009/08/12/1148/</link>
	<description>Not blaming the user since 2007!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: All This ChittahChattah &#124; ChittahChattah Quickies</title>
		<link>http://humanfactorsblog.org/2009/08/12/1148/comment-page-1/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>All This ChittahChattah &#124; ChittahChattah Quickies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanfactorsblog.org/?p=1148#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>[...] Optimal Microwaving with Fitt&#039;s &#956;&#955;-Number &#8211; I had an idea to blog about this myself, funny that someone else did. I try to enter microwave times that require minimal thought (or &quot;mental operator&quot; as they say in Fitt&#039;s Law): &quot;2:22&quot; is about as good as &quot;2:00&quot; when reheating and is provably faster. It obviously doesn&#039;t add a lot of time savings to your day, but it&#039;s been one of those little habits I&#039;ve observed in myself. It&#039;s funny how math education, our money, and the way we tell time and structure our day conditions us to favor certain types of numbers, even when our interfaces don&#039;t.  Share this post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Optimal Microwaving with Fitt&#039;s &mu;&lambda;-Number &#8211; I had an idea to blog about this myself, funny that someone else did. I try to enter microwave times that require minimal thought (or &quot;mental operator&quot; as they say in Fitt&#039;s Law): &quot;2:22&quot; is about as good as &quot;2:00&quot; when reheating and is provably faster. It obviously doesn&#039;t add a lot of time savings to your day, but it&#039;s been one of those little habits I&#039;ve observed in myself. It&#039;s funny how math education, our money, and the way we tell time and structure our day conditions us to favor certain types of numbers, even when our interfaces don&#039;t.  Share this post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  humanfactorsblog.org/2009/08/12/1148/feed/ ) in 1.26693 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 10:11 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 11:11 am UTC -->
