I‘ve always thought text inputs from anything other than a keyboard were clunky. Cliff Kushler, the man who invented T9 (a word completion aid) has developed Swype, a new text entry method that capitalizes on eliminating the press and release component of the touchscreen. What was once a discrete target acquisition task becomes a continuous one.
In the CNET interview, Kushler points out his age (55) and his words-per-minute with Swype (50). Not bad.
If you’re interested in research on alternate text input devices, check out some of the following:
So I finally made the plunge and obtained an Amazon Kindle E-book reader. This isn’t a gadget review site so don’t expect a full review but I just wanted to comment on some of the ergonomic/human factors considerations after using the device for the past few days. The bottom line? There are some critical “book behaviors” that the device does not afford but are critical to me. My reading material is primarily articles, reference books; not narrative fiction (that typically flows in a linear, page-by-page fashion).
The hype concerning the display is warranted. It is extremely high contrast and easy to read even in dim light. What makes this different from reading on an LCD is that the pixels are actually closer to the reading surface (just like paper). The pixel density is also very high (167 dpi) compared to LCDs.
The device is very thin and light. The screen is small but not unusably so.
Search is a nice function. However, I am not sure if this perfectly replaces book indexes. With an index, you can rely on recognition instead of free recall (necessary in search).
Built-in 3G wireless for free.
The software is very simple and the navigation is easy. It is similar to an ATM with soft-options.
The BAD (in no particular order):
Page turning is a bit sluggish (probably .5 to 1 second). I don’t have empirical data to back up actual “performance” differences but it bothers me.
The page forward and backward buttons are too easily pressed when you pick the device up (not a big deal but an inconvenience).
I can dog-ear pages and include notes on pages or passages. My notes are accessible as a text file for use later. However, the text file is sort of meaningless. While my note is there, it is devoid of context (I don’t know where it goes). It would be nice if this functionality was improved.
The on-off switch is located on the back of the device. So when I want to turn it off, I always inadvertently jump a page or two.
Instead of using page numbers to navigate the text, it uses something called “Locations.” I still have not figured out what this is. At the bottom of the screen, it might display, “Locations 203-15”. Are these lines? Paragraphs? Pages?
There is the “previous page” button, but also a “Back” button…and they seem to function similarly under some circumstances but differently in others.
Anne and I are writing a book and I’ve been doing quite a bit of research with articles and books. Typically, I will read a page from a book or article and make notes. Currently, there is not an easy way to export these notes or even email them to myself from the device. As I mentioned, the notes it creates are unusable. Another big thing is that I cannot open multiple books or articles at once–this is a problem with the whole class of devices, not just the Kindle.
These are just some of my recent thoughts on the device. The tentative bottom-line is that I probably won’t be buying expensive reference books on the device (it just can’t yet replace a paper book for my use cases). But reading PDF articles and Word .docs is quite pleasant.
Here are some pictures (the device and the device’s text presentation compared to a real book).
The new law, which generally bars drivers from talking on their phones unless they use a hands-free device, takes effect today, nearly two years after the Legislature passed it. In the weeks leading up to the deadline, customers have been flooding into stores to buy hands-free devices, particularly wireless headsets.
With recent news that it is now illegal in California to use your mobile phone while driving (unless you have a hands-free device), I thought it would be interesting to note that it is not the “holding the phone” that is the problem, it is the cognitive requirements of multi-tasking (driving and talking) that is the problem. Hands-free will not solve this problem. As Strayer, Drews, and Crouch (2006) noted:
When drivers were conversing on either a handheld or hands-free cell phone, their braking reactions were delayed and they were involved in more traffic accidents than when they were not conversing on a cell phone.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Crouch, D. J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48, 381-391.
Verizon Wireless shows no shame in revealing that its Coupe by UTStarcom ($39.99 with a two-year contract) is aimed at retirees. And when you open this clamshell, you’ll know why. Besides its large, easy-to-read screen, the device has a large numeric keypad.Though the phone has these “senior” features, it still has the mobile utilities we all demand, including a built-in speakerphone, a tip calculator, and T9 predictive text capability for text messaging.
The new Nissan GT-R is a sports car that’s about to be released in the United States. The car has been a popular model in the Playstation game Grand Turismo. Apparently, the car’s striking information displays (the real car, not the game car) were designed by the creators of the Grand Turismo series (Polyphony Digital/Sony Computer Entertainment). Certainly fancy, but usable?
With recent tragic events in the United States, there has been pressure for many University campuses to install emergency alert systems. These systems notify students, faculty, and employees of emergency events via email or mobile text messages.
A few months ago, I signed up to the one offered at my University. Today, I received the following note:
You recently signed up to receive Safe alerts on your cell phone. There is some confusion about the sign-up process and you are among a group of users who did not complete the steps that will enable you to receive emergency messages on your phone. [emphasis added]
Your safety is our paramount concern, so please go to [website] to see instructions to complete the process. You will need to find the checkbox labeled “text message” to receive the CU safe alerts on your phone.
We apologize for this confusion and hope to make the sign-up process simpler in the future.
I thought this was unusual because when I initially signed up, the process did not seem overly complicated. To be sure, it was not intuitive, but not complex either. I was certain that I configured the system to send email and text alerts. I guess I was wrong (along with a few other people).
One thing that makes the system seem so apparently complex is that the system is meant to be a general purpose notification system–not just emergencies. When I log in, I see all of the classes I’ve taught, research groups I belong to, etc. organized into “Channels.” Why can’t the system be just for emergency alerts? Then the sign up process would simply involve entering my email and mobile phone number and opting-in. Instead, it looks like this:
I suppose it has to do with some kind of cost-benefit analysis. Why pay for a system that only handles emergencies when we can extend it to general purpose messaging?
For a future post, I should talk about our new warning sirens (which I cannot hear from my office, unfortunately).
Many Americans are jumping into the fast, mobile, participatory Web without considering all the implications. If nothing really bad has happened to someone, they tend neither to worry about their personal information nor to take steps to limit the amount of information that can be found about them online. This finding dovetails with our previous work related to spyware — software that covertly tracks a user as they navigate the net. Internet users who said they had not encountered spyware were less likely to view it as a serious threat and more likely to say it’s just part of life online.
Continuous partial attention is an always on, anywhere, anytime, any place behavior that creates an artificial sense of crisis. We are always in high alert. We reach to keep a top priority in focus, while, at the same time, scanning the periphery to see if we are missing other opportunities, and if we are, our very fickle attention shifts focus. What’s ringing? Who is it? How many emails? What’s on my list? What time is it in Beijing?
Sounds an awful lot like “vigilance” + some kind of personality trait.